Criminals

Understanding Criminal Litigation in India: A Guide for Clients

Criminal litigation in India is a complex and intricate process that demands a deep understanding of the legal system. For those facing criminal charges or seeking to understand the judicial process, navigating this landscape can be daunting. This guide sheds light on the key aspects of criminal litigation in India, offering valuable insights to clients and legal professionals alike.

The journey through criminal proceedings involves several stages, from the initial investigation to the final verdict. This article explores the rights of the accused, the role of legal expertise, and the crucial components that shape criminal cases in India. By breaking down the complexities of the legal system, readers will gain a clearer picture of what to expect and how to approach criminal litigation with confidence and knowledge.

Key Components of Criminal Litigation in India

Criminal litigation in India is governed by three primary components: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam(BSA). These legal frameworks work in tandem to ensure a comprehensive and structured approach to criminal proceedings.

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Indian Penal Code

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), came into effect on July 1, 2024. The BNS replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which was in place since British India. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) serves as the foundational document that defines criminal offenses and their corresponding punishments. Enacted in 1860, the BNS is divided into 358 sections in 20 chapters, covering a wide range of crimes from theft and fraud to more severe offenses like murder and terrorism. It categorizes offenses into cognizable (arrestable without a warrant) and non-cognizable, as well as bailable and non-bailable, based on their severity.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which replaced the The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is a procedural law that outlines the functioning of the police machinery and the procedures to be followed by courts during investigations and trials. It classifies criminal offenses into categories such as bailable, non-bailable, cognizable, and non-cognizable, with each category receiving different procedural treatment. The BNSS governs crucial aspects like filing a First Information Report (FIR), gathering evidence, initiating inquiries, and establishing the hierarchy of criminal courts.

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam(BSA), which replaced The Indian Evidence Act of 1872 is a crucial component that consolidates and defines the law of evidence in India. It applies to all judicial proceedings in courts, including courts-martial, and serves as a prerequisite for any criminal or civil trial. The Act’s primary role is to scientifically reconstruct past events through evidence, aiming to uncover the truth and facilitate effective fact-finding. Based on English evidence law but adapted to Indian realities, the Act has remained largely unchanged for over 140 years, exemplifying exceptional draftsmanship.

Stages of Criminal Proceedings

The criminal justice system in India follows a structured process, consisting of several stages that ensure a fair and impartial trial. These stages are:

First Information Report (FIR)

The first step in the criminal proceedings is the filing of a First Information Report (FIR). An FIR is a written document that formally records information about the commission of a cognizable offense. Any person with knowledge of the crime can provide this information to the police, either orally or in writing. The FIR outlines the initial allegations, details of the offense, and the identity of the parties involved. It serves as the foundation for the investigation and subsequent legal proceedings.

Investigation

After the FIR is registered, the police initiate an investigation to gather evidence and identify the accused. This may involve:
- Visiting the crime scene
- Collecting witness statements
- Analyzing forensic evidence
- Conducting searches and seizures (with proper warrants)
During the investigation, the police may interrogate the accused or other individuals connected to the case. They may also order concerned persons to appear for questioning.
If there is sufficient evidence against the accused, the police may make an arrest, following the procedures outlined in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
Upon completing the investigation, the police submit a chargesheet or a closure report to the court. A chargesheet is filed when there is enough evidence to proceed with a trial, while a closure report is submitted when no evidence is found.

Trial

The court examines the chargesheet and decides which charges to formally bring against the accused.
The accused is informed of the charges and given the opportunity to respond and seek legal representation.
During the trial, the prosecution presents its witnesses and evidence to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
The defense counsel cross-examines the prosecution’s witnesses and presents evidence to establish reasonable doubt or challenge the prosecution’s case.
Both parties make closing arguments summarizing their positions.

Judgment and Sentencing

After considering all the evidence, arguments, and legal aspects, the judge delivers the final verdict, either acquitting or convicting the accused.
If convicted, the judge imposes an appropriate sentence, considering the severity of the offense and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
The aggrieved party may file an appeal or a revision petition in a higher court if dissatisfied with the judgment.
The final stage is the execution of the court’s orders, once all legal remedies have been exhausted.

Rights of the Accused in Criminal Cases

The Indian legal system recognizes and upholds several fundamental rights of individuals accused of criminal offenses. These rights serve as safeguards against arbitrary actions and ensure a fair trial.

Right to Bail

Bail stands as a fundamental component within the criminal justice system, enabling individuals accused of a crime to secure release from custody while awaiting trial. It upholds the accused’s right to a fair trial. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita governs the provisions related to bail.

The courts consider various factors, such as the nature of the offense, the accused’s background, and the risk of tampering with evidence or absconding, when deciding whether to grant bail.

Right to Legal Representation

The accused has the right to legal representation at all stages of the criminal proceedings. This right ensures that the accused receives a fair trial and has access to legal expertise. The Constitution and statutory laws in India guarantee this right.

Defense lawyers play a crucial role in protecting the constitutional rights of the accused, including the right to a fair trial, the right to counsel, the right to silence, and protection from self-incrimination. They have a dual duty: to zealously represent their clients’ interests and ensure that legal proceedings are conducted fairly.

Right Against Self-Incrimination

Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution safeguards the right against self-incrimination. This right ensures that no person can be forced to give testimony or evidence that may incriminate themselves. It is based on the principle that no compulsion should be exerted on an accused to speak against themselves.

To invoke this right, three essentials must be fulfilled:

The person must be accused of committing an offense.
The proceedings must be criminal in nature (not civil or administrative).
The testimony or evidence sought must be self-incriminatory.

The right against self-incrimination is a constitutional right that cannot be waived. However, if an accused voluntarily provides a statement, it may be admissible in court. The police have a duty to inform the accused of their right to remain silent.

These rights serve as crucial pillars of the criminal justice system, ensuring that the accused receives a fair trial and is protected from arbitrary actions. It is essential for both the accused and legal professionals to be aware of these rights and their implications.

PRAGMATIC

established in 2011, ‘PRAGMATIC THE CORPORATE LITIGATION FIRM’ strives to get justice for their clients. we believe in a good and honest fight, and we will not stop at anything.

India Delhi

+91 9990026028

Mon - Fri: 9:00 - 17:30